2014 Global SRM Research Report - Customer of choice

Sell SIde perspective

STATE OF FLUX

2014 GLOBAL SRM RESEARCH REPORT

94

Figure I. The buy side’s ability to attract, evaluate and implement innovation – sell side / buy side

Figure H. The degree to which being part of an SRM programme helps sell side companies present innovations to the buy side – sell side

2% HELPED GREATLY

50%

○ SELL SIDE ○ BUY SIDE

11% DON'T KNOW

40%

18% HELPED QUITE A LOT

30%

14% NOT HELPED

20%

10%

55% HELPED A LITTLE

0%

VERY GOOD

GOOD

POOR

DON'T KNOW VERY POOR

© 2014 State of Flux

© 2014 State of Flux

Figure J. Perception of barriers tomore effectivemanagement of innovation – buy side / sell side

○ SELL SIDE ○ BUY SIDE

LACK OF TIME / RESOURCES

NO FORMAL PROCESS TO MANAGE EXTERNAL INNOVATION

MORE PRESSING PRIORITIES

LACK OF CLEAR INTERNAL OWNERSHIP

COMPLEXITY OF THEIR ORGANISATION

INTERNAL RESISTANCE TO CONSIDER EXTERNAL IDEAS

NO STRATEGY REGARDING EXTERNAL INNOVATION

THEY ARE NOT ACTIVELY SEEKING SUPPLIER INNOVATION

NO BARRIERS

OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY)

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

© 2014 State of Flux

INNOVATION

account the fact that for some sell side companies, presenting innovation to customers is a sales channel and as a result they would always want more opportunities. However, it is clear there are opportunities for improvement. Both the buy and sell side share the same view of the barriers to more effective management of supplier innovation ( figure J ). The only area where the sell side opinion differs is in external ideas; they report a higher level of resistance or lack of interest.

Buy side feedback does suggest that the delivery of supplier innovation is making some progress, albeit slow. Last year, we asked sell side companies if SRM programmes were helping them to position innovation with the buy side. The results were more encouraging last year, with 45% suggesting SRM was helping – unfortunately this figure has fallen back this year to 20% ( figure H ). The sell side assessment of how well the buy side are able to manage innovation is broadly consistent with how the buy side view themselves ( figure I ). We have to take into

Powered by