2014 Global SRM Research Report - Customer of choice

GOVERNANCE & PROCESS

STATE OF FLUX

2014 GLOBAL SRM RESEARCH REPORT

104

PROCESS OWNERSHIP

Figure 3.0. The proportion of companies with a formal SRM process owner in place – all respondents

4% DON’T KNOW

The first thing to consider when creating governance and process is ownership. Who will be accountable and responsible for building process excellence? We have seen that for more than 70% of respondents this is owned by procurement. The proportion of companies with a formal SRM process owner in place this year is the same as last, at 64% overall. The figure amongst leaders, fast followers and followers is closer to 80%, indicating the link between more effective SRM and single point accountability for process ownership.

32% NO

64% YES

© 2014 State of Flux

SEGMENTATION



CATEGORY REVIEW

SUPPLIER REVIEW

Some form of supplier segmentation is now carried out by over 80% of companies seeking to establish SRM. However, the approaches adopted, the frequency and the criteria applied still vary considerably. In the vast majority of cases, spend and risk are the dominant criteria. This is most often considered by looking at the subject in a number of ways. The responses reveal that generally two views of spend are considered as part of the segmentation process: across category and with the specific supplier. On occasion, spend is also rolled into total cost of ownership, but this rare. Risk is more often viewed in three ways: inherent risk related to the category; risk related to the failure of specific products and services; and risk related to a specific supplier, including the level of dependency. This chart clearly shows these spend and risk related considerations clustered at the top, representing feedback from over 50% of respondents. The emergence of additional segmentation criteria that focus more on supplier potential and behaviours has to some degree stalled at between 20 and 30% of companies using them for supplier segmentation.

HIGH

STRATEGIC

PREFERRED

TRANSACTIONAL

LOW L

LOW RISK CATEGORIES

MEDIUM RISK CATEGORIES

HIGH RISK CATEGORIES

 INHERENT CATEGORY RISK  IMPACT OF FAILURE  REPUTATIONAL RISK  MARKET DYNAMICS, ETC.

 POTENTIAL TO CREATE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE  TECHNOLOGY AND / OR INNOVATION  APPETITE FOR COLLABORATION  VALUE POTENTIAL, ETC.

OPTIMISED SUPPLIER MANAGEMENT APPROACH

© 2014 State of Flux

Powered by